From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Allen

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 6, 2015
221 N.J. 298 (N.J. 2015)

Opinion

05-06-2015

In the Matter of John C. ALLEN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 050991994).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14–226, concluding that JOHN C. ALLEN of NEW BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client informed about the status of a matter), RPC 8.4(a) (violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN C. ALLEN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Allen

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 6, 2015
221 N.J. 298 (N.J. 2015)
Case details for

In re Allen

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of John C. ALLEN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

221 N.J. 298 (N.J. 2015)
221 N.J. 298

Citing Cases

In re McIlwain

Attorneys who negotiate the dismissal of an ethics grievance commit a violation of RPC 8.4(d), as a matter of…

In re Capriglione

This conduct violated RPC 8.4(d), as a matter of law. See In re Allen, 221 N.J. 298 (2015) (attorney…