From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In Interest of T.R.J

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jun 30, 2010
No. 04-10-00178-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. 04-10-00178-CV

Delivered and Filed: June 30, 2010.

Appealed from the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00426, Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding.

Affirmed.

Sitting: KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Tashandala J. seeks to appeal the trial court's termination of her parental rights to her minor children, T.R.J., and S.L.J., and challenges the trial court's finding that her appeal is frivolous. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(d)(3), (g) (Vernon 2008). Tashandala's court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief representing that he has conducted a professional evaluation of the record and determined the appellate points are without merit. Counsel concludes the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.-San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.-San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.). In compliance with the procedure in Anders, counsel delivered a copy of counsel's brief to Tashandala, who was advised of her right to examine the record and to file her own pro se brief if she disagreed with counsel's determination regarding the merits of the appeal. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.). No pro se brief was filed. Tashandala's attorney has also filed a motion to withdraw.

To protect the privacy of the parties in this case, we identify the children by their initials and the children'smother by her first name only. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (Vernon 2008).

We have reviewed the record on appeal and counsel's brief, and we agree that the appellate points do not present a substantial question for appellate review, and are therefore frivolous. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. REM. CODE ANN. § 13.003(b) (Vernon 2002); see also TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 263.405(d)(3) (incorporating section 13.003(b) by reference). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment, and grant appellate counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 85-86.


Summaries of

In Interest of T.R.J

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jun 30, 2010
No. 04-10-00178-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)
Case details for

In Interest of T.R.J

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF T.R.J. et al., Children

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jun 30, 2010

Citations

No. 04-10-00178-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 30, 2010)