From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hymowitz v. Hymowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1989
149 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 17, 1989

Appeal from the Family Court, Rockland County (Stanger, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the sentence is vacated.

Following a hearing the appellant was found to have willfully failed to comply with a support order requiring him to pay certain college expenses for his son, and the matter was set down for sentencing. Prior to the imposition of sentence, however, he paid the full amount due. Nonetheless, the court then imposed a definite sentence of one-weekend incarceration.

The Family Court is empowered to impose a sentence of up to six months' incarceration for willful failure to comply with a support order (Family Ct Act § 454 [a]; Matter of Cox v Cox, 133 A.D.2d 828). Such imprisonment, however, which is in the nature of punishment for civil contempt (Edwards v Edwards, 122 A.D.2d 18; Wides v. Wides, 96 A.D.2d 592), may only continue until such time as the offender, if it is within his power, complies with the support order (Judiciary Law § 774; Edwards v. Edwards, supra). At bar, it is undisputed that the appellant fully complied with the support order prior to the imposition of the sentence. Accordingly, the court erred in thereafter imposing a definite sentence of incarceration. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hymowitz v. Hymowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 1989
149 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Hymowitz v. Hymowitz

Case Details

Full title:EILEEN HYMOWITZ, Respondent, v. IRA HYMOWITZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 17, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 447

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Martinez

Thus, the Family Court properly found that the father's violation of his child support obligations, as…

Marotta v. Casler

The father now appeals.Upon finding that a respondent has willfully failed to obey a lawful order of support,…