From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutton v. Stoner

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 2, 2006
No. 02-06-159-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 2, 2006)

Opinion

No. 02-06-159-CV

Delivered: November 2, 2006.

Appeal from the 352nd District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL D: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On October 9, 2006, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Hutton v. Stoner

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 2, 2006
No. 02-06-159-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Hutton v. Stoner

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HUTTON, APPELLANT v. DAVID STONER, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 2, 2006

Citations

No. 02-06-159-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 2, 2006)