From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huntsinger v. Gates Rubber Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Mar 10, 1941
149 S.W.2d 632 (Tex. Civ. App. 1941)

Opinion

No. 5274.

March 10, 1941.

Appeal from Dallam County Court; John B. Honts, Judge.

Action between F. E. Huntsinger and the Gates Rubber Company. From an adverse judgment, the former appeals.

Affirmed with judgment against sureties on supersedeas bond.

F. A. Cooper, of Amarillo, for appellee.


This case is before us upon the transcript, but no statement of facts appears in the record. Neither the appellant nor the appellee has filed a brief, but appellee has filed a motion in which he asks that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed and that he have judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond. We have examined the record and find that the cause of action is one of which the trial court had jurisdiction and no fundamental error appears. The motion of appellee will, therefore, be granted, the judgment of the court below affirmed, and judgment here rendered against the sureties on appellant's supersedeas bond for the full amount of the judgment below. Art. 1857, R.C.S., 1925; Cockburn v. Hightower, Chief Justice, et al., 121 Tex. 555, 52 S.W.2d 365; Beauty Service Corporation v. Davis, Tex.Civ.App. 116 S.W.2d 463.

Affirmed with judgment against sureties.


Summaries of

Huntsinger v. Gates Rubber Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo
Mar 10, 1941
149 S.W.2d 632 (Tex. Civ. App. 1941)
Case details for

Huntsinger v. Gates Rubber Co.

Case Details

Full title:HUNTSINGER v. GATES RUBBER CO

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo

Date published: Mar 10, 1941

Citations

149 S.W.2d 632 (Tex. Civ. App. 1941)

Citing Cases

In re A.T.S.

Those facts must be established by the finder of fact to be "highly probable" as held in Colorado v. New…