From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beauty Serv. Corp. v. Davis

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Apr 27, 1938
116 S.W.2d 463 (Tex. Civ. App. 1938)

Opinion

No. 10302.

April 27, 1938.

Appeal from County Court at Law, No. 2, Bexar County; C. J. Matthews, Judge.

Proceeding between the Beauty Service Corporation and Henri Davis. From the judgment, the first-named party appeals and the last-named party filed a motion asking that judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Moursund, Ball, Moursund Bergstrom and W. W. Palmer, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

H. L. Dillashaw, of San Antonio, for appellee.


Neither the appellant nor the appellee has filed briefs herein. However, appellee has filed a motion asking that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, and that he have judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond.

We have examined the record and finding no fundamental error apparent of record appellee's motion will be granted, the judgment of the trial court affirmed, and judgment here rendered for the full amount of the judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas appeal bond.

Affirmed, with judgment against sureties.


Summaries of

Beauty Serv. Corp. v. Davis

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Apr 27, 1938
116 S.W.2d 463 (Tex. Civ. App. 1938)
Case details for

Beauty Serv. Corp. v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:BEAUTY SERVICE CORPORATION v. DAVIS

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Apr 27, 1938

Citations

116 S.W.2d 463 (Tex. Civ. App. 1938)

Citing Cases

Huntsinger v. Gates Rubber Co.

The motion of appellee will, therefore, be granted, the judgment of the court below affirmed, and judgment…