Huggins v. State

Full title: CODY HUGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 12, 2017

216 So. 3d 785 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2D15–5608

05-12-2017

Cody HUGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm Cody Huggins' judgments and sentences and the revocation of his probation. However, the order of revocation of probation entered on December 4, 2015, does not identify the conditions found to have been violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the condition(s) of probation that Mr. Huggins violated. See Greene v. State , 919 So.2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant.").

1

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).