From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huertas v. Videla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2002
294 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

01-08178

Submitted April 16, 2002

May 20, 2002.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated August 7, 2001, which granted the defendant's motion to vacate his default in answering.

Parker Waichman (DiJoseph Portegello, P.C., New York, N.Y. [Arnold E. DiJoseph III of counsel), for appellant.

Morris, Duffy, Alonso Faley, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Yolanda L. Himmelberger and Richard J. Gallo of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in vacating the defendant's default (see Gray v. B.R. Trucking Co., 59 N.Y.2d 649; Warn v. Choi-Lee, 291 A.D.2d 490; I.J. Handa, P.C. v. Imperato, 159 A.D.2d 484; CPLR 5015[a][1]).

RITTER, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Huertas v. Videla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2002
294 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Huertas v. Videla

Case Details

Full title:SANTIAGO HUERTAS, appellant, v. ALEXANDER P. VIDELA, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 469 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 853