Opinion
August 16, 1999.
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The appellant failed to demonstrate her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see, Sanford v. Stillitano, 241 A.D.2d 489). There was conflicting evidence as to how the instant three-vehicle, rear-end, chain-reaction collision occurred, including evidence suggesting that there were multiple impacts. Accordingly, the court correctly denied the appellant's motion ( see, Sanford v. Stillitano, supra; Omrami v. Socrates, 227 A.D.2d 459; Cofrancesco v. Murino, 225 A.D.2d 648).
S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.