From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofrancesco v. Murino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1996
225 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 18, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion of the defendant McClenon which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of the plaintiffs in Action No. 2 is denied.

This appeal arises out of a four-vehicle accident which occurred on March 6, 1992, at the toll plaza of the Verrazano Narrows Bridge on Staten Island. The respondent, Thomas McClenon, testified that he had stopped his vehicle behind the appellants' van, and that his vehicle struck the appellants' van only after being struck by a third vehicle, which had been struck by the fourth vehicle. Although McClenon's testimony was sufficient to establish a prima facie case that he was entitled to summary judgment (see, Koenig v Price, 200 A.D.2d 559, 561), when it is viewed in the light most favorable to the appellants, the appellant Paulette Gabel's deposition testimony that she felt two impacts after the initial impact from McClenon's vehicle was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether McClenon's vehicle struck the appellants' van before the chain reaction collision.

The respondent's remaining contention is without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cofrancesco v. Murino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1996
225 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Cofrancesco v. Murino

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD COFRANCESCO, Plaintiff, v. LUCIANO MURINO et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 471

Citing Cases

Wysocka v. Neglia

Neglia and Nouveau presented evidence that was sufficient to meet their prima facie burden by showing that…

Viggiano v. Camara

In contrast, the plaintiff's both testified at their depositions that, after the collision with Camara, they…