From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Howell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 23, 1997
700 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-3165.

Opinion filed October 23, 1997. Disposition Thereof if Filed.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Original Jurisdiction. Judy M. Pittman, Judge.

Bill A. Corbin, Marianna, for petitioner.

J. David House, Blountstown, for respondent.


Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order finding him to be in civil contempt and committing him to jail for his failure to pay past due child support. We conclude that the trial court's order is facially deficient in that it does not contain a finding that petitioner has the present ability to pay the purge amount.See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985); Coogan v. Coogan, 662 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Moreover, we conclude that the record before this court would not support such a finding, had one been made. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the trial court's order of contempt is quashed.

JOANOS, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Howell v. Howell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 23, 1997
700 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Howell v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY DAVID HOWELL, PETITIONER, v. SHANNON L. HOWELL, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 23, 1997

Citations

700 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Walden v. Adekola

We reach that conclusion because in Commonwealth Federal, the Florida Supreme Court found dismissal of an…