From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coogan v. Coogan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 27, 1995
662 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 95-87.

November 27, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Joseph Tarbuck, J.

Gordon Edward Welch, Pensacola, for appellant.

Laura E. Keene of Berosest Keene, Pensacola, for appellee.


The former husband challenges an order finding him to be in civil contempt, and sentencing him to six months in jail as well as setting a purge amount of $11,870. We find that the portion of the order determining that the former husband has the present ability to pay appears to be inconsistent with the finding that the husband has "deliberately divested himself of the ability to meet his obligations . . ." While past deliberate actions of the husband may support a finding of criminal contempt, the entry of the civil contempt order must be supported by a finding that the contemnor has the present ability to purge himself of contempt. Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). We, therefore, reverse and remand with directions to clarify the court's findings concerning the present ability to pay or conduct further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WOLF, LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coogan v. Coogan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 27, 1995
662 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Coogan v. Coogan

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAM COOGAN II, APPELLANT, v. POLLY O'BRIEN COOGAN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 27, 1995

Citations

662 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Senterfitt v. Oaks

Despite this lack of evidence, the trial court entered an order finding that Mr. Senterfitt had the ability…

Israel v. Israel

Although there is testimony which if believed by the trial court would support a finding that the husband…