From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 27, 1989
547 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-715.

July 27, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, John Antoon, II, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Nancye R. Crouch, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Appellant was charged with and convicted of four separate counts of sale of cocaine, and each of these counts was paired with another count of possession of cocaine (the same cocaine as in the paired charge of sale) with intent to sell and deliver. The crimes were alleged to have been committed in August and September, 1985.

On appeal, appellant contends that he cannot be convicted of both sale of cocaine and possession of the same cocaine with intent to sell and deliver. Because the offenses were committed prior to July 1, 1988, and on authority of the recently decided case of State v. Smith, 547 So.2d 613 (Fla. 1989), we must agree.

As noted in Smith, the legislative amendment to section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1988) which became effective July 1, 1988 would alter the result here, but the amendment is not to be given retroactive effect, and thus does not apply to crimes committed prior to the effective date of the statute. Instead, Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987) applies, and requires reversal of the possession charges.

The sale convictions are affirmed. The possession convictions are reversed. Because the elimination of points for the vacated convictions reduces the recommended guidelines sentence, the cause is remanded for resentencing.

We also vacate the award of costs as a condition of probation which was entered without notice to the defendant and an opportunity to be heard, see Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988). On remand, the court may reconsider imposing costs after proper notice and hearing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DANIEL, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.


Summaries of

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 27, 1989
547 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Holmes v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOE LEWIS HOLMES, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 27, 1989

Citations

547 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Ward v. State

Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989). See also Holmes v. State, 547 So.2d 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989);…

Lee v. State

We also vacate the imposition of costs which were assessed without notice and opportunity to object. Harriel…