From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 29, 1969
436 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)

Opinion

No. 41839.

January 29, 1969.

Appeal from the 180th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Fred M. Hooey, J.

No attorney of record on appeal.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., Phyllis Bell, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


The conviction is for robbery by assault; the punishment was assessed at ten years which was probated.

The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court '(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court' or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412 ; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

There is no showing of indigency.

Nothing appears in the record which should be considered as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

The judgment is affirmed.

DOUGLAS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Hollis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 29, 1969
436 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
Case details for

Hollis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dan Gilbert HOLLIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 29, 1969

Citations

436 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)

Citing Cases

Christopher v. State

No extension of time appears in the record. This is too late for it to be considered. Art. 40.09, Sec. 9,…