From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ochoa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 21, 1968
424 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 41096.

February 21, 1968.

Appeal from the 92nd Judicial District Court, Hidalgo County, Tom L. Hartley, J.

Pena McDonald by L. Aron Pena, Edinburg, for appellant.

Oscar B. McInnis, Dist. Atty., Edinburg, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


The conviction is for burglary; the punishment was assessed at two years.

The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 728.

The grounds attempted to be presented in appellant's brief filed in this court do not raise any constitutional questions.

Nothing appears in the record which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

No question of indigency is raised.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ochoa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 21, 1968
424 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)
Case details for

Ochoa v. State

Case Details

Full title:Isidro Sanchez OCHOA, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 21, 1968

Citations

424 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. Crim. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Sewell v. State

The conviction is for the subsequent offense of driving while intoxicated; the punishment, two years in the…

Schmeideberg v. State

The conviction is for robbery by assault with two prior convictions for non-capital felonies alleged for…