From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. Lazaroff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 28, 2015
Case No. 5:14-cv-01367 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 5:14-cv-01367

09-28-2015

Christopher Hoffman, Petitioner v. Alan Lazaroff, Respondent


ORDER

Before me is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert, filed on August 3, 2015, recommending I deny Petitioner Christopher Hoffman's motion for a stay and abeyance as to the fourth ground for relief presented in his habeas corpus petition and grant Hoffman's alternate request to sever and dismiss the fourth ground for relief to permit Hoffman to proceed with the other, exhausted grounds for relief. (Doc .No. 10). Under the relevant statute, "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Campbell, 261 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2001). In this case, the fourteen day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed.

The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the report. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981) ; Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) ("only those specific objections to the magistrate's report made to the district court will be preserved for appellate review").

Following review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the Order of the Court. Hoffman's motion for a stay and abeyance as to his fourth ground for relief, (Doc. No. 6), is denied. Hoffman's fourth ground for relief is dismissed without prejudice. Magistrate Judge Limbert may proceed with his report and recommendation as to the remaining grounds for relief set forth in Hoffman's habeas corpus petition.

So Ordered.

s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hoffman v. Lazaroff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 28, 2015
Case No. 5:14-cv-01367 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Hoffman v. Lazaroff

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Hoffman, Petitioner v. Alan Lazaroff, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 28, 2015

Citations

Case No. 5:14-cv-01367 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2015)

Citing Cases

Valenzuela v. Keyser

Furthermore, defense counsel's admission that he was ignorant of the law on the application of the defense…

Spagnardi v. United States

See, e.g., Hector v. United States, 17 Nos. 1:12-CR-183-TWT-JSA-1, 1:17-CV-948-TWT-JSA, 2019 WL 3209448, at…