Hixon v. Astrue

Full title: FORREST L. HIXON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 6, 2012

2:11-cv-00152 KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2012)

Opinion

FORREST L. HIXON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 2:11-cv-00152 KJN United States District Court, E.D. California. February 6, 2012

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         The court is in receipt of plaintiffs' motion for a 14-day extension of time in which to file a reply to defendant's opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20).¹ Curiously, although plaintiff represents that defendant does not oppose the motion, the parties did not file a stipulation and proposed order regarding the requested relief. In any event, the undersigned grants plaintiff's unopposed request, which is plaintiff's first request for an extension of time.

1 This case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(15) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time is granted, and plaintiff shall file his reply brief on or before February 13, 2012.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.