From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hixon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-00152 KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-00152 KJN

02-03-2012

FORREST L. HIXON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

The court is in receipt of plaintiffs' motion for a 14-day extension of time in which to file a reply to defendant's opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 20). Curiously, although plaintiff represents that defendant does not oppose the motion, the parties did not file a stipulation and proposed order regarding the requested relief. In any event, the undersigned grants plaintiff's unopposed request, which is plaintiff's first request for an extension of time.

This case proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(15) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time is granted, and plaintiff shall file his reply brief on or before February 13, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hixon v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-00152 KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Hixon v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:FORREST L. HIXON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-00152 KJN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)