From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hitchcock v. Rhodes

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 5, 1887
42 N.J. Eq. 495 (Ch. Div. 1887)

Opinion

03-05-1887

HITCHCOCK v. RHODES, Adm'x, etc., and others.

C. W. Macpherson, for answering defendant. J. H. Baches, for complainant.


Exceptions to answer.

C. W. Macpherson, for answering defendant.

J. H. Baches, for complainant.

RUNYON, Ch. Objection is made to exceptions filed to the answer that they are not signed by counsel. The rules of this court are silent upon the subject, and there is no decision upon it. The English practice requires such signature. Under such circumstances, that practice is to be followed, there being no statutory provision, nor any regulation to forbid. West v. Paige, 9 N. J. Eq. 203.


Summaries of

Hitchcock v. Rhodes

COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY
Mar 5, 1887
42 N.J. Eq. 495 (Ch. Div. 1887)
Case details for

Hitchcock v. Rhodes

Case Details

Full title:HITCHCOCK v. RHODES, Adm'x, etc., and others.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Mar 5, 1887

Citations

42 N.J. Eq. 495 (Ch. Div. 1887)
8 A. 317

Citing Cases

Hartland Prop. LLC v. Town of Hartland

For example, in Smith v. Hard, we considered the effect of the listers’ failure to clearly identify…

Town of Williamstown v. Williamstown Co.

Respecting the abstract of individual lists for 1925 the findings state, "The certificate of the Town Clerk…