From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Troth

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:22-CV-1817-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-CV-1817-TLN-DMC-P

11-15-2022

CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. TROTH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a civil detaineeproceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. Plaintiff's complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the Court to do so.

See District Judge's order at ECF No. 18 in Hill v. Allison, et al., case no. 2:22-CV-0718-KJM-EFB-P.

Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that Plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is granted.


Summaries of

Hill v. Troth

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:22-CV-1817-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Troth

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. TROTH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

2:22-CV-1817-TLN-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)