From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2022
2:22-cv-1685 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1685 KJN P

11-01-2022

CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a civil detainee, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis on September 16, 2022. (ECF Nos. 1, 2). As set forth below, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why his application to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied.

In his application to proceed in forma pauperis, completed under penalty of perjury, plaintiff asserts that he has received no money over the last twelve months from various sources including gifts and other sources. (ECF No. 2 at 1.) Plaintiff alleges that he has no cash. (Id. at 2.) However, plaintiff's prison trust account statement, filed October 17, 2022, in Hill v. Her, 22-cv-1849 KJN (E.D. Cal.), indicates that as of August 26, 2022, plaintiff had $5,221.90 in his prison trust account. (Id., ECF No. 3 at 1.)

A court may take judicial notice of court records. See, e.g., Bennett v. Medtronic, Inc., 285 F.3d 801, 803 n.2 (9th Cir. 2002) (“[W]e may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue”) (internal quotation omitted).

In evaluating plaintiff's in forma pauperis application, the court looks to whether plaintiff has submitted an affidavit that shows he “is unable to pay [the filing fee] or give security therefore.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Plaintiff's prison trust account statement indicates that plaintiff is able to pay the filing fee of $402.00.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why his application to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied and plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee; failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action.


Summaries of

Hill v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2022
2:22-cv-1685 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Hill v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CYMEYON HILL, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-1685 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)