From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Oak Forest

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 10, 2017
NO. 02-16-00486-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 02-16-00486-CV

08-10-2017

TASHANA HILL AND ALL OCCUPANTS APPELLANTS v. OAK FOREST APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 2016-006790-1 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On June 21, 2017, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: PITTMAN, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WALKER, J. DELIVERED: August 10, 2017


Summaries of

Hill v. Oak Forest

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 10, 2017
NO. 02-16-00486-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2017)
Case details for

Hill v. Oak Forest

Case Details

Full title:TASHANA HILL AND ALL OCCUPANTS APPELLANTS v. OAK FOREST APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 10, 2017

Citations

NO. 02-16-00486-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 10, 2017)