From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hill v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
No. C 12-4482 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-4482 MMC

05-09-2013

ANTHONY J. HILL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

In this action, plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge's ("ALJ") decision denying plaintiff's application for supplemental security income benefits.

By order filed February 11, 2013, the Court directed plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment no later than March 28, 2013. On March 28, 2013, plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, submitted to the Clerk of Court his copy of the administrative record, along with a copy of the Court's order of February 11, 2013, and orally requested the Clerk file said documents as his motion for summary judgment. By order filed April 3, 2013, the Court advised plaintiff it would not treat his copy of the administrative record and his copy of the Court's order as a motion for summary judgment, gave plaintiff notice as to the showing he must make in a motion for summary judgment to meet his initial burden to demonstrate his entitlement to relief, and extended to April 30, 2013 the deadline for plaintiff to file his motion. To date, plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary judgment or any other filing.

Defendant previously filed the administrative record with the Clerk (see Doc. 13), and served a copy of the administrative record on plaintiff (see Doc. 14).

Accordingly, the Court hereby DIRECTS plaintiff to show cause in writing, no later than May 31, 2013, why the instant action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. To show good cause, plaintiff must file his motion for summary judgment, along with a separate statement explaining why such motion was not filed within the time required by the Court's order of April 3, 2013.

If plaintiff fails to show good cause in the manner set forth above, the Court will dismiss the action for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hill v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 9, 2013
No. C 12-4482 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Hill v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. HILL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-4482 MMC (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)