From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HIGH v. BACA

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 29, 2008
3:05-cv-00241-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 29, 2008)

Opinion

3:05-cv-00241-LRH-RAM.

September 29, 2008


ORDER


Before the court is Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Findings and Clarification of Court's 3/04/07 Minute Order (#112), Defendants' Motion to Strike (#114), Plaintiff's opposition (#117) and Defendants' reply (#120).

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its review in this case, has fully considered the Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Findings and Clarification of Court's 3/04/07 Minute Order (#112), and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and concludes that the Magistrate Judge's ruling (#108) was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.

The Magistrate Judge's Order (#108) will, therefore, be sustained and Defendants' Motion to Strike (#114) is denied as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

HIGH v. BACA

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 29, 2008
3:05-cv-00241-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 29, 2008)
Case details for

HIGH v. BACA

Case Details

Full title:JUAN X HIGH, Plaintiff, v. JAMES BACA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 29, 2008

Citations

3:05-cv-00241-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 29, 2008)