From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 18, 2023
1:22-cv-01159-ADA-CDB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01159-ADA-CDB (HC)

09-18-2023

MAIKEL HERRERA, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF NOS. 12, 14)

On June 30, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations to grant Respondent's motion to dismiss and to dismiss the petition of Petitioner Maikel Herrera without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 14.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on Petitioner and gave him fourteen days to file objections thereto. As of the date of this Order, more than 14 days have passed, and no objections have been filed. (Id. at 3-4.) The findings and recommendations advised Plaintiff that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id. (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014))).

After Petitioner failed to timely oppose or file a non-opposition to Respondent's motion to dismiss (see E.D. Cal. Local Rule 230(c)), on April 21, 2023, the Court served on Petitioner an order to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust remedies and for mootness considering Petitioner's apparent release from custody. (ECF No. 13.) Five days later, the Order mailed to Petitioner was returned as “undeliverable.” More than 63 days have passed and Petitioner has failed to apprise the Court of his current address, in violation of E.D. Cal. Local Rule 183(b).

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, 1. The findings and recommendations issued on June 30, 2023, (ECF No. 14), are ADOPTED in full;

2. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, (ECF No. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Herrera v. Warden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 18, 2023
1:22-cv-01159-ADA-CDB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Herrera v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:MAIKEL HERRERA, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 18, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01159-ADA-CDB (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2023)