Opinion
1:20-cv-01307-AWI-JLT (PC)
08-24-2021
BENJAMIN HENDRIX, Plaintiff, v. ARCE, Defendant.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF
(DOC. 31)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Plaintiff has filed a document titled, “Motion to Confirm the Defendant C. Arce Waiver Filed July/30/21.” (Doc. 31.) Plaintiff states that he received Defendant's waiver of service of summons, which provides that Defendant must serve an answer within 60 days of June 24, 2021.(Id.) However, it is unclear what relief, if any, Plaintiff is requesting from the Court. Per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(b), motions must state the relief sought and the grounds on which it is sought. Plaintiff's motion does not do this. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.
Defendant filed an answer on August 23, 2021. (Doc. 32.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.