From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynesworth v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 21, 2023
No. 2023-UP-247 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 21, 2023)

Opinion

2023-UP-247 Appellate Case 2019-001249

06-21-2023

Bilal S. Haynesworth, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2023

Appeal From Lexington County Walton J. McLeod, IV, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's denial of Petitioner Bilal S. Haynesworth's application for PCR. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haynesworth v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 21, 2023
No. 2023-UP-247 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Haynesworth v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bilal S. Haynesworth, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 21, 2023

Citations

No. 2023-UP-247 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 21, 2023)