From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hausman v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1997
235 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 28, 1997.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.), entered May 30, 1996, which granted plaintiffs motion for a default judgment against defendant-appellant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Tom, JJ.


Appellant's assertion that he thought his answer would be served along with his mother's, without explaining exactly what led him to this belief or submitting an affidavit from his mother explaining her involvement with his answer, is insufficient to excuse his default in appearance. Nor does appellant set forth a meritorious defense in asserting that plaintiff consented to the payments made on his behalf from the trust by his successor trustee, without submitting any supporting affidavits or documentation from those who might have knowledge of such consent. No genuine issues are raised as to the propriety of service.


Summaries of

Hausman v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1997
235 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Hausman v. Stern

Case Details

Full title:RACHEL HAUSMAN, Respondent, v. ALLAN STERN, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 352 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
653 N.Y.S.2d 8

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Vill. of Lindenhurst, Inc.

A proposed verified answer must set forth allegations sufficient to demonstrate the existence of a…