From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hasan v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2012
1:08-cv-00381-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

1:08-cv-00381-GSA-PC

10-19-2012

JAWWAAD HASAN, Plaintiff, v. C/O JOHNSON, Defendant.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S SURREPLIES


(Docs. 81, 82, 83.)

I. BACKGROUND

Jawwaad Hasan ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this action on March 27, 2008. (Doc. 1.) This action now proceeds on the original Complaint filed on March 17, 2008, against defendant Correctional Officer Johnson ("Defendant"), on Plaintiff's claim for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 19.)

On August 20, 2010, the Court dismissed the Doe Defendants and Plaintiff's supervisory liability claims from this action, based on Plaintiff's failure to state a claim. (Doc. 19.) On February 13, 2012, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's state law claims via Defendants' motion to dismiss. (Doc. 43.)

On May 5, 2012, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docs. 52, 54.) On June 20, 2012, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. 57.) On July 5, 2012, Defendant a reply to the opposition. (Doc. 60, 61.)

On August 10, 2012, Plaintiff filed a supplemental opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (Docs. 70, 71, 72.) On October 1, 2012, Defendant filed a response to the supplemental opposition. (Docs. 77, 78.)

On October 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed three documents: (1) Sur-Reply Objections to Defendant's Medical Evidence, (2) Declaration of Plaintiff in Support of Objection to Medical Evidence, and (3) Sur-Reply to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Supplemental Objections to Defendant's Evidence. (Docs. 80, 81, 82.)

II. SURREPLY

The Local Rules provide for a motion, an opposition, and a reply. Neither the Local Rules nor the Federal Rules provide the right to file a surreply, and the Court neither requested one nor granted a request on the behalf of Plaintiff to file one. Accordingly, Plaintiff's surreplies, filed on October 11, 2012, shall be stricken from the record.

III. CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's surreplies, filed on October 11, 2012, are STRICKEN from the Court's record;
2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed on May 5, 2012, is deemed submitted under Local Rule 230(l); and
3. No further submissions by either party in support of or opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment shall be permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hasan v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2012
1:08-cv-00381-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Hasan v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JAWWAAD HASAN, Plaintiff, v. C/O JOHNSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

1:08-cv-00381-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)