From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harz v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois
Apr 12, 1948
334 Ill. App. 106 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,349. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed April 12, 1948 Rehearing denied April 23, 1948 Released for publication April 23, 1948

INJUNCTIONS, § 148insufficiency of allegations to enjoin enforcement of ordinance. A private property owner and taxpayer residing in City of Chicago could not maintain suit to enjoin enforcement of ordinance authorizing delivery of unclaimed impounded dogs to hospitals for experimental purposes where complaint did not allege that complainant was owner of a dog so disposed of or that complainant had suffered special injury except general averments that complainant had suffered financial loss in disposal of animals by city under ordinance.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. U.S. SCHWARTZ, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the February term, 1948.

Joseph G. Branch, for appellant;

Benjamin S. Adamowski, Corporation Counsel,

Ralph K. Ball, Anan Raymond, Joseph C. Owens, and Tenney, Sherman, Rogers Guthrie, for appellees;

L. Louis Karton, Head of Appeals and Review Division, Sydney R. Drebin, Assistant Corporation Counsel, Poppenhusen, Johnston, Thompson Raymond, Henry F. Tenney and L. Dow Nichol, Jr., of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed April 12, 1948; rehearing denied April 23, 1948; released for publication April 23, 1948.


Summaries of

Harz v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois
Apr 12, 1948
334 Ill. App. 106 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Harz v. City of Chicago

Case Details

Full title:George T. Harz, Appellant, v. City of Chicago et al., Appellees

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Apr 12, 1948

Citations

334 Ill. App. 106 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
78 N.E.2d 660