From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harvard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 5, 2000
756 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D98-2980.

Opinion filed April 5, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; W. Douglas Baird, Judge.

Toby Isaacson, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Robert J. Krauss, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


In this Anders appeal, appellant's counsel states that appellant's probation was properly revoked on the basis of his termination from the PAR program and his possession of cocaine. Our review of the record leads us to agree with counsel that the violations were willful and substantial and that the revocation was proper. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation, we remand to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation. See Cornett v. State, 506 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Givens v. State, 666 So.2d 235 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Harvard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 5, 2000
756 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Harvard v. State

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK HARVARD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 5, 2000

Citations

756 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Curry v. State

However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of community control, we remand to…