From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hart v. Beasley

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Jan 21, 2010
3:09CV00222 WRW (E.D. Ark. Jan. 21, 2010)

Opinion

3:09CV00222 WRW.

January 21, 2010


ORDER


I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

Doc. No. 6.

Doc. No. 8.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

3. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

4. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.


Summaries of

Hart v. Beasley

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Jan 21, 2010
3:09CV00222 WRW (E.D. Ark. Jan. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Hart v. Beasley

Case Details

Full title:JERRY HART PLAINTIFF v. SHARON BEASLEY DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division

Date published: Jan 21, 2010

Citations

3:09CV00222 WRW (E.D. Ark. Jan. 21, 2010)