From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. Carmax Auto Superstores W. Coast, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2017
No. CV 15-6606 FFM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2017)

Summary

stating "cursory reference to service bulletins" does not support opinion that vehicle had latent defect at time of purchase

Summary of this case from Siyu Dong v. BMW of N. Am., LLC

Opinion

No. CV 15-6606 FFM

04-25-2017

GREGORY HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES WEST COAST, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment,

IT IS ADJUDGED that plaintiff take nothing by his Second Amended Complaint, that this action is dismissed with prejudice, and that defendant recover its costs of suit. DATED: April 25, 2017

/S/FREDERICK F. MUMM

FREDERICK F. MUMM

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Harris v. Carmax Auto Superstores W. Coast, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 25, 2017
No. CV 15-6606 FFM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2017)

stating "cursory reference to service bulletins" does not support opinion that vehicle had latent defect at time of purchase

Summary of this case from Siyu Dong v. BMW of N. Am., LLC
Case details for

Harris v. Carmax Auto Superstores W. Coast, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES WEST COAST, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 25, 2017

Citations

No. CV 15-6606 FFM (C.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2017)

Citing Cases

Siyu Dong v. BMW of N. Am., LLC

The first piece of evidence Plaintiff relies on is the SIB. That Bulletin extends the warranty for the high…