From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. Wieking

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 2006
202 F. App'x 274 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted September 18, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Paul Harper, Long Beach, CA, pro se.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-04314-RMW.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, GRABER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

We have reviewed appellant's response to this court's order to show cause, and we conclude that the questions raised in this

Page 275.

appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Harper v. Wieking

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 25, 2006
202 F. App'x 274 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Harper v. Wieking

Case Details

Full title:Paul HARPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard W. WIEKING, Clerk…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 25, 2006

Citations

202 F. App'x 274 (9th Cir. 2006)