From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harper v. Hubert

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Oct 7, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-10556, SECTION: R(6) (E.D. La. Oct. 7, 2008)

Summary

finding a federal application untimely and rejecting a claim that the trial court's failure to advise the petitioner of the prescriptive period for seeking state post-conviction relief violated the petitioner's rights

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Day

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-10556, SECTION: R(6).

October 7, 2008


ORDER


Having reviewed de novo the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Plaintiff's petition be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Harper v. Hubert

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Oct 7, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-10556, SECTION: R(6) (E.D. La. Oct. 7, 2008)

finding a federal application untimely and rejecting a claim that the trial court's failure to advise the petitioner of the prescriptive period for seeking state post-conviction relief violated the petitioner's rights

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Day

finding federal application untimely and rejecting claim that trial court's failure to advise of prescriptive period for seeking state post-conviction relief violated petitioner's rights

Summary of this case from Claude v. McCain
Case details for

Harper v. Hubert

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN HARPER v. CORNEL HUBERT, WARDEN

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO: 06-10556, SECTION: R(6) (E.D. La. Oct. 7, 2008)

Citing Cases

Nelson v. Day

.See also Miller v. McCain, Civ. Action, 2019 WL 297438, at *2 (E.D. La. Jan. 23, 2019) (petitioner's…

John v. Wilhite

See, e.g., Miller v. McCain, Civ. Action No. 18-4724, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10710, 2019 WL 297438, at *2…