From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardney v. Carey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 5, 2008
286 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-50466.

Submitted July 22, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed August 5, 2008.

Michael J. Raphael, Esq., Bruce Searby, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-07-00712-VBF.

Before: B. FLETCHER, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Marco Pinto-Lorenzo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He contends that the district court plainly erred by adding a criminal history point under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(e) on the ground that he committed the instant offense after his release from jail on a prior conviction, even though in fact he committed the offense before his release from custody. This argument was not presented to the district court. We vacate the sentence and remand for the district court to consider Pinto-Lorenzo's argument regarding § 4A 1.1(e).

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Hardney v. Carey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 5, 2008
286 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Hardney v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marco Antonio…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 5, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 503 (9th Cir. 2008)