From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansell v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 20, 2014
13-cv-3440-EMC, 13-cv-05295-EMC, 13-cv-05296-EMC, 14-cv-01347-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)

Opinion

          Joel S. Feldman (admitted pro hac vice), Lisa E. Schwartz (admitted pro hac vice), SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Ryan M. Sandrock, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, San Francisco, California, Steven J. Brodie (admitted pro hac vice), Aaron S. Weiss (admitted pro hac vice), CARLTON FIELDS, P.A., Miami, FL, Attorneys for Defendants.

          Michael W. Sobol, Roger N. Heller, Nicole D. Sugnet, LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for the Hansell, Blaqmoor, and Gandhi Plaintiffs.

          Clayeo C. Arnold, Christine M. Doyle, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, Sacramento, California, J. Andrew Meyer (admitted pro hac vice), John A. Yanchunis (admitted pro hac vice), Rachel Soffin (admitted pro hac vice), MORGAN & MORGAN COMPLEX LITIGATION GROUP. Tampa, Florida, Attorneys for the Browning Plaintiffs.


          JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFIED CASE SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 6-1(B), 6-2, AND 7-12

          EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's May 23, 2014 orders, the current schedule is as follows:

         WHEREAS, the Hansell Plaintiffs have asked to take the deposition of Wal-Mart's Mehrdad Akbar as part of confirmatory discovery.

         WHEREAS, Mr. Akbar's next available date for a full-day deposition is September 30, 2014 and the parties are also available on this date.

         WHEREAS, September 30, 2014 is after the discovery cut-off and the same day as the Hansell Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Approval is due.

         WHEREAS, the Court has previously ordered the following time modifications:

Hansell Dkt. 27, 28: Extending time to file answer

Hansell Dkt. 61, Blaqmoor Dkt. 29, Gandhi Dkt. 29: Rescheduling CMC

Blaqmoor Dkt. 16, Gandhi Dkt. 16: Modifying schedule on arbitration motion

Hansell Dkt. 72, Blaqmoor Dkt. 38, Gandhi Dkt. 50: Rescheduling hearing on motion to stay.

         WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate to the following modified schedule, pushing back the discovery cut-off and each briefing deadline by eight days, to allow the Hansell Plaintiffs to take Mr. Akbar's deposition prior to the close of discovery and the filing of their Opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Approval:

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hansell v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 20, 2014
13-cv-3440-EMC, 13-cv-05295-EMC, 13-cv-05296-EMC, 14-cv-01347-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Hansell v. Tracfone Wireless, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HANSELL, EDWARD TOOLEY, and CHRISTOPHER VALDEZ, individually and on…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

13-cv-3440-EMC, 13-cv-05295-EMC, 13-cv-05296-EMC, 14-cv-01347-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014)