Hanscom v. Advance Auto Parts

Full title: DAVID HANSCOM v. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS AND ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia

Date published: Nov 29, 2005

Record No. 1321-05-1 (Va. Ct. App. Nov. 29, 2005)

Opinion

Record No. 1321-05-1.

November 29, 2005.

Appeal from the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission.

(David Hanscom, pro se, on brief).

(Robert A. Rapaport; Jennifer Tatum Atkinson; Clarke, Dolph, Rapaport, Hardy Hull, P.L.C., on brief), for appellees.

Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata.

MEMORANDUM OPINION^_

_ Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

PER CURIAM.

David Hanscom appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission finding that (1) he failed to prove he remained partially disabled after June 13, 2002, as a result of his compensable injury by accident; and (2) he was not entitled to a change in treating physicians. We have reviewed the record and the commission's opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Hanscom v. Advance Auto Parts, VWC File No. 202-41-09 (May 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.