Opinion
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01506-LJO-SKO PC
08-24-2012
BRUCE PATRICK HANEY, Plaintiff, v. L. EPTSTEIN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. 34)
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Bruce Patrick Haney is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action for violation of his rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action for damages is proceeding on Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Epstein and Gonzales. On August 23, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Local Rule 230(l). Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Although Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated, Local Rule 230(l) shall continue to apply to this action, in accordance with the Court's general practice.
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE