From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-511.

12-30-2022

Gary Lee HAMM, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and Betty Wyatt , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and Betty Wyatt , Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following a jury trial. However, we remand for entry of an amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $100.00 (not $150.00) for the costs of prosecution consistent with the court's oral pronouncement.

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener's error.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hamm v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Hamm v. State

Case Details

Full title:Gary Lee HAMM, II, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 30, 2022

Citations

353 So. 3d 687 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)