From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hamilton v. Son

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 19, 2021
2:19-cv-2210 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2210 JAM AC P

11-19-2021

DAVID HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. M. SON, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a request for the court to provide him with copies of “FRP 408 and F.R.P 403” because he has not been able to physically go to the law library to make copies and conduct research. ECF No. 27.

Within the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure there are no rules 408 or 403. Assuming that plaintiff is requesting copies of rules from the Federal Rules of Evidence, the court does not provide copies without payment of the appropriate fee, regardless of whether a party is proceeding in forma pauperis. 1

The Clerk's Office provides copies of documents at $0.50 per page.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for copies, ECF No. 27, is DENIED. DATED: November 19, 2021 2


Summaries of

Hamilton v. Son

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 19, 2021
2:19-cv-2210 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Hamilton v. Son

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. M. SON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2210 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2021)