From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Halpern v. Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

September 23, 1999

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered March 23, 1998, which denied defendant's motion to reject the report of the special referee and to appoint a new referee for a new trial, and granted plaintiff's cross motion to confirm the report of the special referee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Cheryl S. Solomon for plaintiff-respondent.

Harold H. Newman for defendant-appellant.

ELLERIN, P.J., TOM, MAZZARELLI, WALLACH, LERNER, JJ.


The report of a referee should be confirmed if the findings therein are supported by the record (Namer v. 152-54-56 W. 15th St. Realty Corp., 108 A.D.2d 705). Since there is ample basis in the record for the findings of the referee in this case, the IAS court's confirmation of the referee's findings was proper and should not be disturbed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Halpern v. Halpern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Halpern v. Halpern

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE HALPERN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SONIA HALPERN, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 402

Citing Cases

Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Milter

"The First Department has long held that "[t]he report of a referee should be confirmed if the findings…