From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. Gillispie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 8, 2013
2:12-cv-02016-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cv-02016-LRH-CWH

05-08-2013

LEONARD HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, v. DOUG GILLISPIE, Defendant.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman (#6) entered on March 11, 2013, recommending dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint (#1-1) filed on November 20, 2012, for failure to comply with the Court's Order #4. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#6) entered on March 11, 2013, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#6) entered on March 11, 2013, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Complaint (#1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hairston v. Gillispie

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
May 8, 2013
2:12-cv-02016-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Hairston v. Gillispie

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, v. DOUG GILLISPIE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-02016-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. May. 8, 2013)