From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hafezy v. Garland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 25, 2024
3:24-cv-04584 LJC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-04584 LJC

09-25-2024

HAMED HAFEZY, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, et al., Defendants.

ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney ELIZABETH D. KURLAN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants ZACHARY NIGHTINGALE Van Der Hout LLP Attorney for Plaintiff


ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney

ELIZABETH D. KURLAN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendants

ZACHARY NIGHTINGALE Van Der Hout LLP Attorney for Plaintiff

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; AND ORDER

LISA J. CISNEROS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties, through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate to an extension of time for Defendants' response to Plaintiff's complaint. Defendants will file their response on or before October 16, 2024.

The parties further request a corresponding extension on the deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment under the Court's Immigration Mandamus Procedural Order. Dkt. No. 7. Currently, Defendants must file a motion for summary judgment by 120 days after the complaint was served, or November 28, 2024. In view of the agreed-upon extension for Defendants' response to the complaint, the parties request that Defendants must file their motion for summary judgment by December 16, 2024.

Respectfully submitted,

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories listed herein concur in the filing of this document.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH D. KURLAN

I, Elizabeth D. Kurlan, declare and state as follows:

1. I am an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California and counsel of record for the federal Defendants in the above-captioned action.

2. On July 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint in which he seeks adjudication of his parents' applications for immigrant visas. See Dkt. No. 1. Our office was served with the complaint on July 31, 2024.

3. On September 9, 2024, my office contacted Plaintiff's counsel regarding Defendants' request for an extension of time to prepare their response to the complaint, and Plaintiff consented to the request.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.


Summaries of

Hafezy v. Garland

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 25, 2024
3:24-cv-04584 LJC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Hafezy v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:HAMED HAFEZY, Plaintiff, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-04584 LJC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)