From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gusman v. Cnty. of San Mateo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 9, 2021
20-cv-07820-YGR (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-07820-YGR

08-09-2021

DAVID GUSMAN, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Defendant.


CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, United States District Judge.

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

Case Management Conference: Monday, April 18, 2022 at 2:00 p.m.

Referred To Magistrate Sallie Kim for Settlement Conference to be Completed by: December 17, 2021

Last Day to Join Parties or Amend Pleadings: Only for good cause by Motions under FRCP Rule 16(b)(4)

Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff: February 7, 2022

Disclosure of Expert Reports:

All Experts, Retained and Non-Retained Must Provide Written Reports Compliant with FRCP 26(a)(2)(B): Opening: March 14, 2022

Rebuttal: April 11, 2022

Expert Discovery Cutoff: May 9, 2022

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE HEARD BY: 35 day notice [filed June 6, 2022]

See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment.

Compliance Deadline (See Page 2) Friday, September 23, 2022 at 9:01 a.m.

Joint Pretrial Conference Statement: September 30, 2022

Pretrial Conference: Friday, October 14, 2022 at 9:00 a.m.

TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH: Monday, November 7, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. for Jury Trial

Pursuant to the Court's Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance deadline on Friday, September 23, 2022 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the Court's Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance deadline, if necessary, shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance deadline, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance deadline will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.

The parties must comply with both the Court's Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All Standing Orders are available on the Court's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gusman v. Cnty. of San Mateo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 9, 2021
20-cv-07820-YGR (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Gusman v. Cnty. of San Mateo

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GUSMAN, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 9, 2021

Citations

20-cv-07820-YGR (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)