From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guryn v. Guryn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 2003
308 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-09763

Submitted September 15, 2003.

September 29, 2003.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment entered June 24, 1991, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), dated September 30, 2002, as granted the plaintiff a credit toward his child support obligation for college expenses he paid.

Dean J. Sallah, Holtsville, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas K. Campagna, P.C., Ronkonkoma, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new calculation of the financial capabilities of the plaintiff to contribute to the costs of college.

The plaintiff's obligation for college expenses cannot be credited toward his child support payments because the parties entered into a stipulation in open court, incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce, which expressly required the plaintiff to assume a share of their children's college expenses ( see Regan v. Regan, 254 A.D.2d 402, 403; Grobman v. Grobman, 251 A.D.2d 544; Matter of Kurzon v. Kurzon, 246 A.D.2d 693, 694-695). To permit a credit would eliminate entirely any meaningful contribution of the plaintiff toward college expenses and would repudiate the provision of the stipulation that child support payments continue while the child is enrolled in college until the age of 22 years.

In fixing the plaintiff's contribution to college expenses, the parties' stipulation required that the Supreme Court determine the plaintiff's financial capabilities at the time the child is enrolled in college. The child support obligation of the plaintiff is but one of the factors to be considered in ascertaining his financial capabilities.

Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new calculation in accordance with the parties' stipulation.

FLORIO, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Guryn v. Guryn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 2003
308 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Guryn v. Guryn

Case Details

Full title:WLODZIMERZ GURYN, respondent, v. DEBORAH S. GURYN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 716

Citing Cases

Dorcean v. Longueira

The agreement set forth the father's obligation to pay basic child support and educational expenses in…

DD v. ID

Defendant's "obligation for college expenses cannot be credited toward his child support payments because…