From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gurule v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Apr 16, 2010
No. CIV-08-1170 JCH/LAM (D.N.M. Apr. 16, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV-08-1170 JCH/LAM.

April 16, 2010


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT


THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 27) (hereinafter, "Motion") in the amount of $7,479.54 for attorney's fees. In his response (Doc. 28), the Commissioner does not object to Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees in this amount. The Court having considered the submissions of counsel, as well as relevant law, and being otherwise fully advised FINDS that Plaintiff's motion is well-taken and will be GRANTED. WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 27) is GRANTED and Plaintiff Gerald Gurule is authorized to receive $7,479.54 for payment to his attorney for services before this Court, as permitted by the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and in accordance with Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246, 1255 (10th Cir. 2007).

If Plaintiff's attorney is also awarded fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) for work in this case, the smaller of the two awards must be returned to Plaintiff. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gurule v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Apr 16, 2010
No. CIV-08-1170 JCH/LAM (D.N.M. Apr. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Gurule v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GERALD GURULE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Apr 16, 2010

Citations

No. CIV-08-1170 JCH/LAM (D.N.M. Apr. 16, 2010)