Gullo v. State

Full title: Kyle GULLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: May 13, 2022

338 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-573

05-13-2022

Kyle GULLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Brett Kocijan and O. H. Eaton, Jr., of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Brett Kocijan and O. H. Eaton, Jr., of Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, Casselberry, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the postconviction court's order denying Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, but we do so without prejudice to Appellant filing a legally sufficient motion under this rule, if he can do so in good faith.¹

1 We take no present position as to the merits of Appellant's claim.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., COHEN and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.