From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenhaw v. Clarke

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 19, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1812 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1812 MCE KJM P.

August 19, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 18, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, which includes an additional exhibit.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file including the new material submitted by petitioner, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 18, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Greenhaw v. Clarke

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 19, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1812 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2008)
Case details for

Greenhaw v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:JESSE JAMES GREENHAW, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARKE, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 19, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1812 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ledesma v. Barnes

The statute of limitations applies to challenges to convictions and sentences alike. See Connell v. Hubbard,…