Opinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence K. Karlton, Chief Judge, Presiding.
Before O'SCANNLAIN, BERZON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
Marcellus A. Greene appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his Eighth Amendment rights by delaying delivery of seizure medications. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124, 1129 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Greene failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether prison officials acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. See Broughton v. Cutter Laboratories, 622 F.2d 458, 460 (9th Cir.1980).
The district court properly denied Greene's motions for appointment of counsel because he did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).
Greene's remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.